The Atlanta Hawks find themselves in an enviable spot with their rookie class. In an era where draft picks are highly valued, the team secured three players who could become meaningful contributors within two years. The headliner is Kingston Flemings, the No. 8 overall pick, widely regarded as the second-best point guard in the draft after Darryn Peterson. His freshman season at Houston was exceptional: he led the Cougars in points, assists, steals, and three-point percentage, while finishing second on the team in defensive rebounds—a rare feat for a point guard. Expectations are sky-high, and for good reason.

Yet Flemings faces a critical question: can he finish at the rim? His passing and shooting are already promising. During Summer League, he displayed high-level vision, and his shooting indicators are solid. In college, he attempted only 3.6 threes per game but shot 84.5% from the free-throw line and 44.3% from midrange, with 10.5 midrange attempts per 100 possessions—all above-average marks that suggest NBA floor-spacing ability. However, his rim finishing is a legitimate concern. He generated nine rim attempts per 100 possessions (86th percentile) but converted just 57.2% of those shots. Summer League only amplified the worry, as he shot 31.8% from the field and seemed more inclined to find teammates than attack the basket. While the sample size is small, this trend bears watching. If Flemings hovers around 55-60% at the rim this season, it would signal encouraging growth. His primary value to the Hawks lies in the physicality he brings compared to CJ McCollum—a factor that could accelerate a transition to a starting role next season.

Zuby Ejiofor, selected at No. 23 from St. John’s, faces a steeper climb. NBA forwards and centers typically develop slowly, but Ejiofor’s age (22) and four years of college experience give him an edge. He is immediately useful as a hustle player—grabbing boards and blocking shots. At St. John’s, he posted a block percentage of 7.2% (80th percentile) and grabbed 12.1% of available offensive rebounds (80th percentile). His defensive rebounding was weaker, at 14.7% (4th percentile), but his motor and a reduced NBA role should help him improve. In college, he carried the team across multiple categories, which limited his ability to focus solely on rebounding. In the NBA, a simplified role will allow him to refine strengths and minimize weaknesses. His shooting is the key question. Ejiofor made 30% of his threes as a senior but improved to 35.3% on 4.3 attempts per game during Summer League. That percentage is serviceable, but whether it translates to NBA games remains uncertain. His motor makes him playable as a finisher and rotation big, but consistent shooting will determine his minutes.

Henri Veesaar, the second-round pick out of UNC, enters with a smaller role. He lacks Flemings’ pedigree and Ejiofor’s experience, but he offers a unique skill: shooting. Veesaar hit 42.6% from three on decent volume while protecting the paint as a seven-footer. However, his defense is a major question. At North Carolina, he posted a block percentage of 3.8% (75th percentile), which is modest for a center. He is adequate in drop coverage but lacks speed and strength to body up opponents. If he cannot become a reliable shot blocker, his playing time will be limited. His shooting touch is legitimate—he connected on 53.5% of midrange attempts and over 40% from deep—and he grabbed 21.9% of available defensive rebounds (84th percentile). The path to a backup role exists, but it may be better for him to develop defense in College Park (the G League affiliate) for most of the season before earning spot minutes later. Gaining strength while preserving his shooting stroke will be critical for his defensive survival. Whether that improvement arrives in Year 1 will be fascinating to watch.